Friday, April 24, 2026

NRC Completes Fastest-Ever Reactor License Renewal, Extending Operations To 2050

NRC Masthead

XInstagramFacebookYouTubeFlickrNRC HomepageOPA.ResourceNRC LinkedIn

No: 26-046 April 23, 2026
CONTACT: Office of Public Affairs, 301-415-8200

NRC Completes Fastest-Ever Reactor License Renewal,
Extending Operations To 2050

“This milestone proves we can deliver results quickly without compromising safety.”

ROCKVILLE, Md. — The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has renewed the operating license for a second time for H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit 2, marking the fastest license renewal review in agency history and the first completed under new federal timelines aimed at accelerating nuclear energy decisions.

The 20-year renewal extends the plant’s authorization to operate through July 2050, allowing the South Carolina facility to generate carbon-free electricity for up to 80 years. The plant’s single pressurized water reactor is operated by Duke Energy Progress LLC.

“This milestone proves we can deliver results quickly without compromising safety,” Chairman Ho K. Nieh said. “By focusing on essential factors for sustained nuclear power plant safety and applying lessons learned from past renewals, our team was able to work efficiently while maintaining their commitment to enabling timely safety decisions.”

The review was completed within the 12-month timeframe established by Executive Order 14300, cutting six months from the NRC’s previous 18-month schedule, while maintaining the agency’s rigorous safety standards.

The NRC conducted its review on parallel tracks, issuing a final supplemental environmental impact statement in March 2026 and a safety evaluation in April 2026. These documents, along with additional details about the renewal, are available on the NRC website.

 

NRC Announces Opportunity to Request Hearing for Duane Arnold Energy Center Restart License Amendments

 

NRC Masthead

XInstagramFacebookYouTubeFlickrNRC HomepageOPA.ResourceNRC LinkedIn

No: 26-044 April 23, 2026
CONTACT: Office of Public Affairs, 301-415-8200

NRC Expands Wyoming’s Authority Over
Key Nuclear Materials as Rare Earth Development Grows

ROCKVILLE, Md. — The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved an amendment to its agreement with Wyoming, allowing the state to take on expanded regulatory authority over certain radioactive materials tied to mineral processing, an area gaining importance as domestic rare earth development accelerates.

Effective April 30, 2026, the amendment enables Wyoming to regulate source material recovered during the processing of minerals such as rare earth elements, where uranium or thorium is not the primary product. This change reflects growing national interest in strengthening U.S. supply chains for critical minerals used in energy, defense, and advanced technologies.

“Our amended agreement reaffirms NRC’s commitment to enabling the safe and secure use of nuclear materials through strong partnerships with our state counterparts,” NRC Chairman Ho K. Nieh said. “Effective collaboration between federal and state regulators is fundamental to protecting public health and safety while fostering responsible innovation.”

Wyoming has regulated uranium recovery facilities and certain byproduct materials under an NRC agreement since 2018. This amendment expands that authority to include additional source material generated as a byproduct of other mineral processing activities, positioning the state to play a larger role in overseeing emerging sectors such as rare earth production.

Following a comprehensive review, the NRC determined Wyoming’s program is adequate to protect public health and safety and compatible with agency requirements. With this approval, the NRC will transfer regulatory authority for this category of materials to the state, including oversight of licensing, inspection, and enforcement. One existing NRC license will be transferred to Wyoming as part of the agreement.

A notice of the amendment was published in the Federal Register. Supporting documents and additional information about the NRC’s Agreement State program are available on the NRC website.

 

[decomm_wkg] Department of Energy Seeks to Partner with Private Sector for Used Nuclear Fuel Recycling

 
EM Press Release Banner

Department of Energy Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center
550 Main Street, Room 7-010, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45202


 

Monday, April 13, 2026

Audit of DOE Nuclear Energy contract for NuScale shows mismanagement

This new Dept of Energy Inspector General's  report is useful for showing how DOE Nuclear Energy mismanaged the NuScale project, as well as other projects.  Our taxpayer money wasted again!

Audit of DOE Nuclear Energy contract for NuScale shows mismanagement.

https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2026-03/DOE-OIG-26-25.pdf


Donna Gilmore

Sunday, April 12, 2026

ISFSI liability protection gap

Hello:

The Price-Anderson Act provides compensation for offsite damages from a nuclear plant release of radioactivity. Kinda. Sorta.

When a nuclear plant is operating, up to nearly $16 billion is available for harm caused by radioactivity released from a reactor core, its spent fuel pool, or an onsite ISFSI.

This liability protection consists of private insurance (currently at $500 million) purchased by the plant owner supplemented, if necessary, by funds collected from the owners of other operating nuclear plants. 

When a nuclear plant permanently shuts down, the NRC approves exemptions from the Price-Anderson insurance coverages. In November 2023, the NRC approved an exemption for Indian Point reducing its private insurance level to $100 million and dropping the site from the supplemental pool.

The NRC's "logic" for the exemptions is that the risk of an accident at an ISFSI is very, very, very low. Perhaps. But is the risk of a terrorist act at an ISFSI of a permanently shut down plant equally low? The NRC's "analysis" did not consider terrorist acts. And the force-on-force tests of security at operating plants is terminated once a plant permanently shuts down.

To be fair, nuclear security is quite good. No nuclear plant or dry cask has ever been stolen (as far as we know). 

But a terrorist act at the Indian Point ISFSI were to cause more than $100 million in offsite damages, who would provide the compensation?  Who? And how?

Perhaps the Stafford Act would fill in for the AWOL Price-Anderson Act. All it would take is an act by the federal government (you know, the folks who have been shut down the past few weeks because of their inability to reach agreement on a budget) to invoke the act. 

The NRC's assumption that a terrorist attack on an ISFSI at a permanently shut down nuclear plant should be backed, at least, by their conducting force-on-force tests of the untested security they are relying so much on to protect Americans. 

In the force-on-force tests conducted at operating reactors, the mock bad guys "win" a small percentage of the time (about 4 to 5 percent.) That's good. It shows the tests don't ask simply questions like "Who's buried in Grant's Tomb" and accept "Dead people" as a correct answer. The losses allow security weaknesses to be remedied before real bad guys can exploit them. Force-on-force tests are essential in determining that security is sufficient and identifying gaps needing to be closed. 

Thanks,
Dave Lochbaum