Tuesday, August 11, 2026

SUN DAY Campaign: Wrap-up of News Story Excerpts (New Studies & Data on Sustainable Energy and Climate Change) for July 27-August 9, 2026

SUN DAY CAMPAIGN

(founded 1992)
8606 Greenwood Avenue, Suite #2; Takoma Park, MD 20912-6656 
301-588-4741;  sun-day-campaign@hotmail.com 

follow on BlueSky at: @sun-day-campaign.bsky.social

  

July 27-August 9, 2026                                                                                            

To:        Recipients
From:    Ken Bossong, editor  
Re.        News Story Excerpts (New Studies & Data on Sustainable Energy & Climate Change)

Note: News story excerpts provided below do not necessarily reflect the views of the SUN DAY Campaign or any of its respective members.

# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
 
BI-WEEKLY NEWS STORY EXCERPTS  
 
NEW STUDIES, DATA, AND RESOURCES:

Mixed/Multi-Sector:

The U.S. Clean Energy Boom Will Continue to 2030 but Then Things Get Hazy:
Canary Media, by Julian Spector, July 29, 2026
In their new annual “Taking Stock” report, Rhodium Group says renewables are set for big growth over the next few years, despite Trump’s attacks. Whether it lasts depends on some key variables. The good news is that solar, wind, and battery construction is still on track to bust records through the end of the decade. The bad news: After 2030, all bets are off; the spectrum of plausible outcomes runs from clean energy maintaining record installations to new construction nearly drying up in the face of competition from natural gas plants. In Rhodium’s low-emissions scenario, the low-carbon sources continue to romp, reaching 53-GW of annual installations through 2040 while holding new gas plants to just 5-GW annually. In the high-emissions scenario, the inverted price dynamics elevate gas to 16-GW of annual deployments and suppress clean energy construction to just 3-GW per year. In the middle scenario, renewables fall to an average of 16-GW annually in the first half of the 2030s, then rebound to 45-GW for the second half; annual gas additions meanwhile sit at about 9-GW over the course of the decade.

===================================

Solar:

‘Wait-and-See’ Approach Driving Stability in U.S. Module Prices:
PV-Tech.org. by J.P. Casey, July 31, 2026
Figures from solar and storage supply chain platform Anza show that the median price for a solar PV module assembled in the U.S. held steady at $0.3/W, marking the third consecutive month of this average module price in the U.S. Even looking earlier this year, there has been relatively little change in U.S. module prices, with median prices increasing by just $0.0005/W between April and May this year, prior to the three months of stable prices.

=======================================

The World Crossed a Major Solar Milestone:
Bloomberg.com, by Akshat Rathi, August 3, 2026
The rapid deployment of solar power is one of the greatest stories of the 21st century. After crossing the 100-gigawatt mark in 2012, it took the world 10 years to deploy 1 terawatt of solar power. An additional 1 terawatt, enough to meet all of US power demand at its peak, took less than three years to build. Not even two years later in 2026 - the precise timing is subject to debate among analysts - the 3-terawatt threshold was reached. No one really noticed. Forecasters are so bullish about solar that, in just a few years, the 3-terawatt milestone will seem almost insignificant. BNEF expects the world to deploy more than 9 terawatts of solar by 2036.

=======================================

In a First, Utah Got More Power from Solar Than Any Other Source:
Grist, by Leia Larsen, August 6, 2026
Utah used to run on coal, but now renewables are surging. According to data from Ember, the state’s solar generation eclipsed all other electricity sources for the first time ever in May, the culmination of a slow but steady years-long shift away from coal. Photovoltaic panels in Utah produced nearly 1-TWh in May 2026. That represented nearly a third of all electricity generated in the state that month. Natural gas generated 32 percent, coal generated 28 percent, and wind 2 percent.

=======================================

Wind:

Nordex Scores 480-MW U.S. Turbine Hat-Trick:
ReNews.Biz, by Vicky Doe, August 4, 2026
and
The Nordex Group has secured three U.S. orders with a combined capacity of more than 480-MW. The contracts cover the supply of 81 N163/5.X turbines for three projects. The turbines for the projects will be manufactured at the Nordex Group’s production plant in Iowa and delivered in line with customer-specific requirements. The names of the customers, the locations of the projects and the financial terms of the contracts were not disclosed.

=======================================

Bioenergy:

Ethanol Capacity Ticks Up in May as Biodiesel and Renewable Diesel Capacity Hold Steady:
Biomass Magazine, by Erin Krueger, August 5, 2026
According to data released by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, total operable U.S. biofuels capacity increased slightly in May, with gains for ethanol while biodiesel and renewable diesel capacity were unchanged. Total biofuel production capacity reached 25.298 billion gallons per year in May, up 14 MMgy when compared to the previous month and up 270 MMgy when compared to May 2025. Ethanol capacity reached 18.374 billion gallons per year in May, up 14 MMgy when compared to April and up 62 MMgy when compared to May of last year. Biodiesel production capacity, at 1.955 billion gallons per year, was unchanged when compared to April, but down 29 MMgy when compared to May 2025.

=======================================

Biofuel Feedstock Consumption Expanded in May:
Biomass Magazine, by Erin Krueger, August 5, 2026
According to data released by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S. biofuel producers consumed 30.749 billion pounds of feedstock in May, up 10% when compared to April and up 8% when compared to May 2025. Biofuel producers consumed 26.612 billion pounds of corn in May, up from 10% when compared to the previous month and up 7% when compared to May of last year. Grain sorghum consumption reached 598 million pounds, up 9% when compared to April, but down 10% when compared to May 2025.

=======================================

New Data Reveals How America’s Biogas Is Used Today:
Biomass Magazine, August 7, 2026
According to new data released by the American Biogas Council, over half of America’s biogas is used for electricity generation, even as the share upgraded to renewable natural gas has nearly doubled since 2020. Approximately 53% of U.S. biogas is used for power generation, 46% is converted to RNG, and just over 1% is used to produce renewable heat, illustrating how different sectors use biogas to meet different energy needs. The way captured biogas is used has shifted significantly over the past five years. In 2020, only about one-quarter of captured biogas was upgraded into RNG. Today, that share has nearly doubled as new projects increasingly choose RNG as their primary energy product, reflecting changing market opportunities.

=======================================

Hydropower:

Hybridizing Hydro Could Ease Grid Constraints:
Renewable Energy World, by Pamela Largue, August 3, 2026
A new report by think tank Ember shows that adding wind and solar behind the meter of existing hydropower assets could not only lower network build-out costs but also bypass grid constraints altogether. The analysis shows that hydropower plants eligible for hybridization operate at 19% of their maximum output on average. Adding wind and solar could increase utilization to 36% and 31%, respectively. While sites vary, in some cases wind and solar could potentially triple use of the same grid connection. More specifically, 25-GW of new wind and solar can be added behind the meter of existing hydropower plants without disrupting typical dispatch behavior.

========================================

Storage:

Global Battery Storage Capacity Projected to Surge Sixfold by 2030:
PV-Magazine, by Ryan Kennedy, July 27 2026
According to a report from GlobalData, global battery energy storage capacity is projected to expand sixfold between 2025 and 2030 at a 42% compound annual growth rate, driven by utility procurement, grid constraints, and surging power demand from AI data centers. The U.S. market closed 2025 with a record-setting 57.6-GWh of new storage additions, bringing total cumulative grid-scale capacity to 137-GWh. Market momentum has accelerated into 2026, with first-quarter installations reaching 9.7-GWh, representing a 32% year-over-year increase and marking the largest first quarter on record for the domestic sector. Front-of-the-meter utility-scale projects represent over 75% of domestic volume, with developers adding 7.8-GWh in the first quarter of 2026 alone. The U.S. Energy Information Administration projects that developers will bring 24-GW of utility-scale batteries online throughout 2026, with buildouts concentrated heavily in Texas at 53%, California at 14%, and Arizona at 13%.

========================================

Energy Storage Corporate Funding Declines to $8.9 Billion in H1’26:
Renewables Now, by Veselina Petrova, August 4, 2026
According to Mercom Capital Group, corporate funding in the global energy storage segment, including venture capital (VC) funding, debt and public market financing, slipped by 2% in annual terms in the first half of 2026 to $8.9 billion. The total was raised across 73 deals, the number of which rose from 55 a year back. The higher activity was recorded despite the continued policy, trade and supply chain uncertainty in the sector. At $1.6 billion, VC funding decreased from $1.7 billion, while the number of deals rose to 51 from 36 in the first half of 2025. Downstream energy storage firms were responsible for most of the VC funding, followed by metal-hydrogen and lithium-ion-focused battery companies, energy storage systems providers and battery recycling companies. Announced debt and public market financing for the energy storage segment totaled $7.3 billion from 22 deals, marking a 1% drop from a year ago. In the meantime, merger and acquisition activity spurred and marked a 275% year-on-year jump with 15 transactions, against only four in January-June 2025.

========================================

Battery Storage Capacity Averaged 70% Growth Over the Last Three Years:
U.S. Energy Information Administration, August 7, 2026
Utility-scale battery storage capacity in the U.S. increased significantly during the last three years, with an annual average growth rate of 70%. By the end of 2025, the U.S. power system had operational battery storage capacity of 43.6-GW. During the first six months of 2026, operators added another 8.3-GW of battery storage capacity, reaching nearly 52-GW of nameplate battery storage capacity. Operators anticipate bringing an additional 54-GW of battery storage capacity online over the next two and half years, according to plans they have reported. Plans for additional capacity coming online in the second half of this year total 14-GW. Operators currently plan to add 26-GW in 2027 and 14-GW in 2028. Solar photovoltaic plants host the largest battery storage capacity units.

========================================

California Surpasses 21-GW of Energy Storage Connected to Grid:
Solar Power World, by Kelly Pickerel, August 7, 2026
According to the California Energy Commission, the state has installed more than 21-GW of energy storage across the state, making it one of the largest battery fleets in the world. When Governor Gavin Newsom took office in 2019, less than 700-MW of battery storage served the grid. The jump to 21,112-MW is an increase of more than 2,500% in just seven-and-a-half years. That’s equivalent to roughly one-third of the statewide peak demand, which exceeded 63,000-MW during the September 2022 heat wave. Of the total battery storage serving Californians, nearly 16,000-MW comes from 310 utility-scale battery systems located within California, and an additional 2,000-MW comes from utility-scale battery facilities located in Nevada and Arizona. These resources are part of the California Independent System Operator grid, which serves about 80% of Californians. Another 3,000-MW comes from more than 300,000 smaller battery systems installed at homes, schools, farms, businesses and industrial facilities across the state.

========================================

Electric Vehicles:

Hybrid Sales Rise While Battery Electric Sales Remain Lower After Tax Credit Expiration:
U.S. Energy Information Administration, July 27, 2026
In the second quarter of 2026 (2Q26), 24% of new light-duty vehicles sold in the U.S. were hybrid electric, battery electric, or plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, up from 22% in 2Q25. Between 2Q25 and 2Q26, hybrid electric vehicles continued to gain market share, reaching a record 16% of light-duty vehicle sales. The market shares of battery electric and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles decreased, according to estimates from Omdia. In 2Q26, battery electric vehicle sales were 6% of new light-duty vehicles sold, down from 7% in 2Q25; plug-in hybrid electric vehicle sales fell from 1.9% to 1.4% over the same period. Battery electric vehicles made up a record 12% of light-duty vehicle sales in September 2025, immediately before the credits expired. However, 2025 marked the first year where annual sales and market share of battery electric vehicles declined, a trend that has continued in 2026.

========================================

V2G Could Deliver 15 Times More Value Than One-Way Managed EV Charging:
UtilityDive.com, by Brian Martucci, July 29, 2026
According to an analysis by energy modeling consultancy E3 commissioned by General Motors, the U.S. fleet of bidirectional-capable electric vehicles is growing, and regulatory reforms could help utilities unlock $7 billion in potential value. Vehicle-to-grid integration could deliver five to 15 times more value per electric vehicle in many electricity markets than one-way managed charging. The nationwide potential value of vehicle-to-grid integration will reach approximately $7 billion by 2030.

=========================================

Globally, Drivers Flock to EVs Amid Rising Gas Prices from Iran War:
EE News, by Brian Dabbs, July 30, 2026
and
According to a new report from the International Energy Agency, global sales of electric cars are expected to grow 10 percent this year, hitting 29 percent of total car sales. Overall, amid rising gas prices from Iran war, more than 90 countries recorded year-on-year growth in electric car sales during the first half of 2026.

=========================================

CLIMATE CHANGE:

In First Third 2026, U.S. CO2 Emissions from Energy Use Dropped 2%:
U.S. Energy Information Administration, July 28, 2026
and
According to the latest issue of EIA’s “Monthly Energy Review” report, U.S. CO2 emissions attributable to energy use were 2.09% less in the first third of 2026 compared to the same period in 2025 but 1.64% higher when compared to 2024. The recent decline was due to a 11.5% drop in emissions due to coal consumption as well as declines of 1.8% and 3.0% in CO2 emissions from natural gas and biomass respectively. CO2 from oil use rose, however, by 1.2%. Oil accounted for the largest share of CO2 emissions (43.01%), followed by natural gas (37.59%), coal (13.70%), biomass (5.58%), and “other” (0.12%).

=========================================

California’s Carbon-Pricing Program Generated $36.2 Billion for Climate Initiatives:
UtilityDive.com, by Zoya Mirza, July 30, 2026
According to a new report from the California Air Resources Board, the state’s Cap-and-Invest program - a carbon-pricing mechanism that places a firm cap on major sources of greenhouse gas emissions throughout the state - has generated $36.2 billion for climate investments since its inception in 2013. About $15.5 billion from this figure has already been deployed across 122 programs to back over 600,000 projects that aim to deliver clean air, energy efficiency, affordability and emissions reductions. Moreover, 76% of the funding deployed specifically targets disadvantaged and low-income communities and households.

===========================================

More in New Poll Say Extreme Heat Impacting Their Lives:
The Hill, by Tara Suter, August 6, 2026
According to a new Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll, more Americans are saying extreme heat is impacting multiple facets of their lives. When asked how extreme heat had impacted their electricity bills in the last year, 81 percent said it had affected the bills to a “major” or “minor” extent, while 69 percent said the same in 2024. Half of respondents said their sleep has faced a “major impact” or “minor impact” from extreme heat in the last year, while 39 percent said the same in 2024. Fifty-one percent said

[decomm_wkg] bill for hubs takes Yucca off the table



July 30, 2026

Trump administration lays legislative groundwork for hubs, would take Yucca off table

By ExchangeMonitor

The Donald Trump White House has drafted a memo to Congress, pushing for legislation to remove Yucca Mountain in Nevada as the sole site for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste.
The 1987 amendments of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act established Yucca Mountain as the sole repository for high-level waste. However, plans for Yucca were abandoned during the Barack Obama administration. 
During his first term, Trump flirted with the idea of resurrecting Yucca Mountain, but ultimately decided  not to force waste disposal at the Nevada site. The legislative proposal would open the door for the Department of Energy’s Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses to be designated spots for potential waste disposal.
DOE on Tuesday tentatively announced five states, Idaho, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Utah, as finalists to host an innovation campus. Of the five states, only three will be selected to have a nuclear hub, which will be finalized later in 2026. 
It is “about time for the Trump Administration to finally recognize we will not allow nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain,” Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.) said in a Tuesday X post. While Rosen appreciates the pivot away from Yucca, she said until the law changes it, she will keep on “fighting” to make sure nuclear waste does not come to Nevada without consent.
In the memo viewed by Exchange Monitor, the White House wants Congress to authorize DOE to pick one or more Lifecycle Innovation Campuses in willing host states. It would also declare it the policy of the government “to encourage the recycling of used nuclear fuel,” codifying the policy in President Trump’s Executive Order 14302. 
Several lawmakers have already  discussed updating the Nuclear Waste Policy Act to clear the way for the proposed nuclear hubs. Officials sought revisions to remove Yucca as the designated repository site for high-level nuclear waste and to incorporate ways to implement fuel reprocessing.
The White House policy draft also seeks to redefine the categories that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission would authorize allowing for different waste disposal options based on risk profiles.  Currently, waste is either categorized as high- or low-level waste. 
The memo lays out “legislative principles” for these proposed Congressional changes. The White House did not respond to the Monitor’s Monday inquiry for comment.
The proposed changes would also clarify the roles between the agencies in the authorization of the Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campus sites, with NRC being in charge of licensing waste disposal. DOE or NRC could  authorize reactors and other fuel cycle facilities in certain cases. 
The White House also wants authorization of interim storage to allow for nuclear reprocessing to occur. The administration also wants to establish the Office of Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation.
“The Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campus initiative imagines a new future for the nuclear industry and a broader vision for America,” the White House said in the memo. “With the establishment of a fully integrated fuel cycle, the United States will lead the twenty-first century in nuclear technologies securing our economic and energy future.”
Released as a solicitation in January, the Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campus initiative is the Trump administration’s effort to gauge states’ interest in potentially hosting a waste disposal and other fuel facilities and nuclear projects. Over half of the states responded to DOE’s inquiry by its April deadline.

Tuesday, August 4, 2026

Cost of four new Kudankulam reactors jumps 55% after Ukraine war delays

This is almost the same per kilowatt as Vogtle 3 and 4.

https://energy.economictimes.indiatimes.com/amp/news/power/cost-of-four-new-kudankulam-reactors-jumps-55-after-ukraine-war-delays/132734728

Cost of four new Kudankulam reactors jumps 55% after Ukraine war delays

The four reactors of 1 gigawatt each are now estimated to cost 1.38 trillion rupees ($14.4 billion), according to a written reply to parliament by Atomic Energy Minister Jitendra Singh on Wednesday.

Updated On Jul 30, 2026 at 03:02 PM IST

The cost of adding four Russian-designed nuclear reactors at the Kudankulam plant in southern India has surged by more than half after the war in Ukraine pushed back construction by almost three years.

The four reactors of 1 gigawatt each are now estimated to cost 1.38 trillion rupees ($14.4 billion), according to a written reply to parliament by Atomic Energy Minister Jitendra Singh on Wednesday. That is 55 per cent more than the estimates published in 2024.

Steep cost escalations and holdups are symptomatic of the challenges faced by the sector. Similar projects from the US and the UK to Bangladesh have also suffered due to a sharp increase in expenditure after construction delays. Georgia’s Vogtle plant, the first nuclear project built in the US in decades, was delivered years behind schedule at more than double its original budget.

The projected expenditure for two of the new Kudankulam reactors has risen by 73 per cent while the estimate for the remaining increased by 40 per cent , federal government data showed. The cost overruns will make electricity generated by these plants more expensive, posing hurdles for nuclear expansion in India’s price-sensitive power market.

“While nuclear is important for climate risk mitigation and energy security, costs need to be contained,” said Rupesh Sankhe, senior vice president for research at Elara Capital India Pvt Ltd., adding that this may dent the plant’s competitiveness compared to other sources of power. “Very high costs only enforce the anti-nuclear argument and can create further opposition to projects.”

India has installed two Russian reactors of 1-gigawatt capacity each at Kudankulam, a coastal town near the southern most tip of the country, and construction is ongoing for four more. The new reactors will be commissioned through March 2030, with the first expected to start operations in June next year, according to Singh. The government had earlier said that all these reactors will be completed by 2027.

The costs for building four 700-megawatt domestic reactors, two each at Kaiga in Karnataka and Gorakhpur in Haryana, are also set to be revised, Singh informed the parliament on Wednesday.

India currently has 8.8 gigawatts of nuclear power capacity which contributes to about 3 per cent of the country’s power output. Last year, the government opened up the sector to private firms, pursuing an ambitious goal of expanding the country’s nuclear generation capacity eleven-fold by 2047.

Study reveals massive quantities of undeclared uranium are exported from the DRC - College of Engineering - University of Wisconsin-Madison

https://engineering.wisc.edu/news/study-reveals-massive-quantities-of-undeclared-uranium-are-exported-from-the-drc/

Study reveals massive quantities of undeclared uranium are exported from the DRC

July 30, 2026

By: Adam Malecek

A study conducted by University of Wisconsin-Madison and Princeton University nuclear engineers has identified a major blind spot in nuclear accounting with global nuclear security implications.

According to the researchers, large quantities of uranium have been extracted, concentrated and exported from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) over the past 20 years. This uranium has traveled through the DRC’s cobalt supply chain without being declared to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Published in the journal Nature Communications on July 30, 2026, the research also uncovers significant environmental and health risks to miners and surrounding communities from discarded uranium in mining waste streams.

The researchers used country-wide mineralization and geochemical data, mine-level trade records and a chemical model of cobalt processing to quantify the amount of uranium that has been dug up in the DRC and exported in cobalt-hydroxide shipments or left behind in the environment.

They estimate that 2,000 to 5,000 tonnes—approximately 4.4 million to 11 million pounds—of natural uranium were exported from the DRC, embedded in cobalt-hydroxide shipments between 2000 and 2024—even though there was no officially reported uranium production in the DRC in decades.

Less than 10% of this material appears to have been publicly declared and placed under international safeguards, according to study co-author Sébastien Philippe, a nuclear security expert and assistant professor of nuclear engineering and engineering physics at UW-Madison.

“This quantity of undeclared uranium could be used to produce fissile material for roughly 600 to 1,500 nuclear weapons or fuel a standard light-water nuclear reactor for 10 to 25 years, so it’s quite a large amount,” says Philippe, a 2025 MacArthur Fellow. “And because this uranium is undeclared and not officially reported as being mined and extracted, it has no limitation placed on its end use. It could end up in a civilian nuclear energy program or in a military program, because nobody is going to ask where this uranium is going. It’s not on the books.”

UW-Madison Assistant Professor Sébastien Philippe (left) and research fellow Ryan Manzuk used country-wide mineralization and geochemical data, mine-level trade records and a chemical model of cobalt processing to quantify the amount of uranium that has been dug up in the DRC and exported in cobalt-hydroxide shipments or left behind in the environment. Photo: Joel Hallberg.

Philippe says most of the shipments went to China, which is home to about 95% of the world’s cobalt refineries. During the process in which crude cobalt hydroxide is refined to produce cobalt metal, uranium must be removed—and becomes a highly valuable byproduct.

“Our scientific research doesn’t show this was done purposefully to get uranium out of the DRC,” says Philippe. “However, one of the things we’re concerned about is that the volumes of exported uranium we’ve quantified are beyond what is supposed to be declared to the IAEA, both by the DRC and China. So that’s an issue.”

The DRC’s Copperbelt is the world’s leading source of cobalt, a metal essential to the global energy transition. In recent years, surging demand from lithium-ion battery manufacturers, especially for electric vehicles, has driven a boom in cobalt mining in the DRC. In this region, uranium naturally co-occurs with cobalt ores. Due to its chemical composition, the mineral that cobalt comes from in the DRC is exceptionally good at getting other elements, such as uranium, to stick to it. And, unless deliberately removed, that uranium stays with the cobalt all the way though extraction, processing into cobalt hydroxide and being exported as an industrial raw material.

“In a lot of mining industries, when you’re targeting one specific element, there’s often other ones that come along with it,” says Ryan Manzuk, a research fellow in Philippe’s group at UW-Madison and at Princeton University, who is the paper’s first author. “So when companies are mining specifically for the cobalt mineral in this region, they’re also extracting relatively high quantities of uranium—more uranium than you would get in your average rock—because the uranium is hitching a ride on the cobalt. And when you’re mining cobalt ore near somewhere that used to be mined for uranium, which is the case in the DRC, you could have quite a lot of uranium associated with it.”

In addition, the researchers estimate that 1,000–4,000 tonnes of uranium were likely discarded to mine tailings, the waste stream from mining, in chemically mobile forms, posing environmental and health risks to miners and communities surrounding the mines.

Philippe and Manzuk say their findings point to an urgent need to address these risks. Important first steps include improved accounting of uranium extraction and shipment, systematic assay measurement of cobalt-hydroxide shipments and worker radiation monitoring. “Based on what we found, I think there needs to be an extensive national audit of mining in the DRC and new rules for separating uranium from the cobalt supply chain,” Philippe says. “There’s also a need for surveillance and monitoring mechanisms to ensure this is happening in an environmentally responsible way.”

Ultimately, preventing uranium exports requires refining cobalt to metal within the DRC, according to the researchers.

The project was built on an innovative partnership between scientists and investigative journalists working together on a public interest research investigation. Philippe and Manzuk collaborated with journalists and editors from Lighthouse Reports and the Financial Times. On July 30, 2026, the Financial Times published an in-depth investigation that expands on the findings reported in the accompanying Nature Communications paper through additional reporting, interviews and documentary evidence. Lighthouse Reports also published a behind-the-scenes account describing the methodology, collaborative process, original research and investigative techniques used throughout the project.

This research was supported by funding from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and from the Center for Policy Research on Energy and the Environment at Princeton University.

Featured image caption: A satellite image of the DRC from the researchers’ study. Image courtesy of Ryan Manzuk.

US clears oldest nuclear plant site for four advanced SMR-300 reactors

https://interestingengineering.com/energy/49-year-u-s-nuclear-power-site-prepares-for-future-with-four-smr-300-reactors

Historic U.S. nuclear site eyes four SMR-300 reactors after 49 years of service

The proposed project could create about 4,000 construction jobs in New Jersey.

ByGeorgina Jedikovska                  Energy             

Trump wants to expand NPP maybe for profit. AP piece in LAT and OCR today

As Trump boosts nuclear power, regulators seek to eliminate a landmark radiation safety practice

https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2026-07-26/as-trump-boosts-nuclear-power-regulators-seek-to-end-radiation-safety-practice

OCR has the same AP story but they cut out the last 6 paragraphs.  Trump wants the NRC to rexlax regulations regulating NPP. NYTimes today also has a story that the Trump family will profit in its investments with expansion of nuke power plants.  What is needed to reduce costs is relaxing standards for radiation safety to the workers and to the public.  They want to eliminate the requirement to have radiation exposure as low as paossible (ALARA= as low as reasonably achieveable) to setting a high point which should not be exceeded. No where do they discuss that biological effects are CUMULATIVE over time.  The international standard is 2 REM/year and Trump wants it to be 5 REM/year. 


rjohnson

By Jennifer McDermott
July 26, 2026 10:47 AM PT
​​​​​​​

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing to eliminate a foundational safety principle that has for 50 years minimized the radiation people in the United States are exposed to and that has been adopted around the world.

Currently, facilities such as nuclear plants, hospitals or academic institutions that use radioactive materials must ensure radiation exposures are kept “as low as reasonably achievable” — the ALARA principle. The NRC proposal would abandon that philosophy while keeping a separate standard on maximum radiation exposure.

The two standards have worked together in radiation safety. Dose limits set the maximum amount of radiation the public and radiation workers can be exposed to, while ALARA kept radiation exposure as low as practical under those limits. Research shows radiation exposure increases a person’s chance of getting cancer, a risk that increases as the dose increases. 

The dose limits are not changing. But the NRC, which regulates civilian nuclear energy technologies and radioactive materials, now wants to replace ALARA with a “graded approach” that includes several actions facilities must take depending on the potential dose of radiation to workers. More rigorous radiation protection measures would be required when approaching dose limits to ensure they aren’t exceeded.

This comes as President Trump attempts to quadruple domestic nuclear energy production because of surging electricity demand amid a data center and artificial intelligence boom. Reforming the NRC is one way Trump is trying to speed up nuclear reactor development. He instructed the federal agency in an executive order last year to “adopt science-based radiation limits.”

The Energy Department, which oversees national energy policies, has already stopped using ALARA. The NRC expects to finalize its radiation protection regulations in the coming months.

NRC Chairman Ho Nieh said the commission is not lowering the bar on safety.

“We’re just removing the ambiguity,” he said in a call with reporters. “But the standard for exposure to workers and the public, those are not changing. We’re just putting in place greater clarification.”

Nieh doesn’t expect major changes within the nation’s existing fleet of large, traditional reactors. But companies designing and building new, smaller reactors could move faster with a clearer picture of the radiation protection requirements, he said.

Could radiation doses creep higher?

The NRC said radiation exposure limits are set well below levels associated with health effects, and it expects remaining standards and industry practices to keep radiation doses far below the limits. There’s incentive to do so — it’s more expensive and time-consuming to work in areas with higher radiation because access must be restricted and more surveys are required.

The nuclear industry’s trade association agrees with the NRC.

“We will always continue to look at what can we do to reduce the dose to workers, and maintain our doses to the off-site public as low as possible,” said Doug True, chief nuclear officer at the Nuclear Energy Institute. “It’s not like we’re just going to throw open the doors and let everything run up to the limits.”

ALARA created a “moving target” for regulation, said Justin Friedman, a nuclear energy consultant who previously spent three decades at the U.S. Department of State. Getting rid of the rule would allow NRC scientists to make more rational decisions about appropriate levels of manageable risk, he added.

Some experts question cutting ALARA

Edwin Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists, cautions that some parts of the NRC proposal could raise permissible radiation doses in certain cases, while still staying below the cap. Lyman highlighted a proposed revision to radionuclide emissions standards, in particular.

Radiation exposure to the general public is limited to 100 millirem per year. A typical dose of radiation from a chest X-ray is 10 millirem.

The NRC wants to increase its radionuclide emissions standards from a conservative, 10 millirem per year dose to 25 millirem per year, based on a hypothetical person living in a house at the property line for a nuclear plant.

The NRC says actual doses to the public would remain far lower because, in reality, people live farther from nuclear sites and benefit from dispersion in air and water.

The NRC should improve, rather than eliminate, ALARA, Lyman said, to protect the public and workers. ALARA has become a political target because some people mistakenly believe radiation exposures have to be as low as possible no matter the cost, Lyman said. In reality, it allows trade-offs.

Katy Huff, a former U.S. assistant secretary for nuclear energy, said in some cases, the requirement may be challenging to regulate. Additional clarity would improve the regulatory environment without harming the public, added Huff, a professor and department chair at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

However, Huff said, she thought the NRC was going to clarify what “reasonably” means in ALARA without scrapping it. She said she’s open to being convinced the graded approach will be just as effective.

One expert sees a mixed bag

The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, chartered by Congress to provide independent scientific guidance, has not formally weighed in yet. Council President Kathryn Higley said she likes some things in the 180-page document but thinks others are problematic.

The NRC should look at the whole picture for managing risk, she said. For instance, if a worker at a nuclear power plant were to enter an area where airborne radioactive materials are present, in keeping with ALARA, they might wear full personal protective equipment with respirators, said Higley, professor emeritus at Oregon State University. That makes them move slower, potentially subjecting them to heat stress that could hurt them more than a low dose of radioactivity, she said.

A concern with the proposal, Higley said, is that it maintains the current occupational dose limit for adult radiation workers at 5 rem, or 5,000 millirem, per year. With ALARA in place, the average dose to workers has been well below that cap.

The International Commission on Radiological Protection recommends an occupational dose of 2 rem per year on average. The NRC previously found it wasn’t justified to match that, because workers were exposed to less than that and changing regulations is costly.

Higley said the U.S. may need to align with the international community if ALARA is going away.

McDermott writes for the Associated Press