Thursday, November 28, 2024

"Oklo-Mission Impossible" - Financial Analyst Firm's Report on Oklo

Thanks to Bob Schaeffer for finding this. Nov 2024 report from Kerrisdale Capital on Oklo. References IEEFA's SMR/new reactors cost chart (page 10) and even hyperlinks on page 1 to the term "Nuclear Bros." to Dr. Ed Lyman's great blog.

Excerpt: We believe investors should be wary of unsubstantiated claims spouted by these "Nuclear Bros.” Recent SMR projects have experienced dramatic cost escalation, Oklo does not have the long-term supply of enriched uranium fuel it needs (and won’t well into the 2030s), and sodium-cooled reactors have well-documented reliability problems.  

https://www.kerrisdalecap.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/OKLO-Kerrisdale.pdf

Westinghouse, Core Power join forces for floating nuclear power plant - World Nuclear News

Westinghouse, Core Power join forces for floating nuclear power plant - World Nuclear News

Sunday, November 24, 2024

Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Request for Exemption

Eric,

Hearings cannot be requested on exemption requests. However, there is an opportunity to do so regarding license amendment requests.

As is the case with the Palisades potential restart review, there will be license amendment requests associated with the Three Mile Island 
Unit 1 potential restart licensing reviews.

Neil Sheehan
NRC Public Affairs

TMI-2 SOLUTIONS, LLC, THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 2 - NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000320/2024003

TMI-2 SOLUTIONS, LLC, THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 2 - NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000320/2024003

ADAMS ACCESSION NO. ML24319A127

Wednesday, November 20, 2024

PJM’s Capacity Auction: The Real Story

PJM’s Capacity Auction: The Real Story

Fossil fuel un-reliability and PJM’s failure to speedily connect new clean resources to the grid are to blame for the 2025/26 auction price spike.




View of the Herbert A. Wagner Coal Generating Station in Maryland. Fossil fuel plants like Wagner caused the price spike in PJM's latest auction.

On July 30, PJM announced the results of its capacity auction for 2025-2026, which showed total costs of nearly $14.7 billion, compared to last year’s $2.2 billion. There are two major causes for blame: fossil fuel un-reliability and PJM’s failure to speedily connect thousands of megawatts of wind, solar, and storage to the grid. This was foreseeable and preventable, and PJM’s failure to allow for new clean energy to come online and plan for more transmission has forced the bill onto ratepayers. 

In this blog, we’ll break down what happened, and show that solutions are within reach. 

What happened?

PJM’s capacity market is set up to ensure that there is enough electricity to meet demand on the hottest and coldest days of the year. Capacity auctions, which happen annually, occur when power plants are paid to commit to be available, or customers are paid to conserve during emergencies.

For years, PJM has over-relied on fossil fuel power plants, even while affordable new power sources are coming online. Gas plants are prone to fail during extreme weather, such as winter storm Elliott in 2022 – when we need them the most. Since PJM did not account for fossil resource weaknesses in its previous capacity market auctions, customers paid for these plants as if they were reliable. That’s like buying a house at full price only to realize the foundation is crumbling. It now turns out that the repairs are quite expensive.

Last year, PJM took the first step in remedying this problem by changing the way all resources are evaluated for reliability, resulting in a more accurate process known as “marginal capacity accreditation.” According to S&P Global, the result was that roughly 26 gigawatts (GW) of gas and coal resources were shown to be unreliable, and thus could no longer claim to benefit PJM at their assumed full output during all weather conditions. 


This chart shows the drivers for the change in PJM’s capacity prices between the last auction (for the 2024-5 year) and the most recent auction (2025-6). Both supply and demand changes drove the price increase. Negative values indicate reductions in capacity in PJM’s system, while positive values indicate additional available capacity. Market changes to better evaluate the reliability of all resources caused the shift in risk periods and resulting additional capacity (far left orange bar), the gas derates, the coal derates, the solar derates, and the changes to the Installed Reserve Margin (IRM). We can see that the reduction in gas capacity is the largest driver for the “tightening” of PJM’s system. Retirements and load growth, while significant, contributed less to the overall price. Only 110 MW (0.1 GW) of new resources came online to help provide capacity; the low number is due mostly to slow interconnection queues. 

Credit: NRDC

As with most markets, when supply falls, prices rise. With 26 GW of gas and coal resources now deemed to be unreliable and therefore not counted in its capacity market, the price of capacity in PJM spiked. Affordability, but not reliability, is now at risk.   

We need not have come to this place. Why? There are over 286 GW of new resources waiting to come online in the interconnection queue. That is far more than the 135 GW of resources that cleared in the PJM auction. Even a fraction of these queued resources could significantly improve reliability and affordability if they were able to come online. 

Unfortunately, PJM has slow-walked interconnection reforms to connect these resources to the grid. This sticker shock is a direct result of delays in getting new energy online, together with the transmission to support it. Many of these resources would have absorbed and buffered the price increases by increasing supply.


Fewer new resources and imports participated in the 2025/26 auction than ever before, showing a clear downward trend.

Credit:

PJM Interconnection, “2025/2026 Base Residual Auction Report,” July 30, 2024.

This doesn’t mean we need more gas – on the contrary, it shows that fossil fuels are expensive and unreliable, and a diverse resource mix will benefit the region far into the future. These high prices are sending a signal to build, and PJM shouldn’t stand in the way of progress. Instead, PJM seems more interested in keeping aging and expensive fossil plants alive, such as Brandon Shores in Maryland, rather than expediting the interconnection of new resources to the PJM power system.

What about retirements and load growth?

Around 6 GW of fossil plants retired since the last auction. The fossil lobby will say this is due to draconian regulations that are forcing power plants to retire before their time, but the truth is that most of these plants are no longer economically viable. Most of the retiring resources are decades-old coal plants, built in the 1960s, and some are facing bankruptcy. Lower-cost, reliable clean energy can replace even more of them, but only if they can get online – which requires PJM to accelerate the interconnection process. 

Projected load growth of 3.2 GW further strained the system, which is a 2.2% increase over the last planning year. Planning for load growth and retirements is important, but the principal driver of the capacity market price increase was PJM derating the gas plants to reflect their lower reliability value. The gas and coal derating (26 GW) was nearly three times as much as the combination of retirements and load growth. 

How can we fix this?

PJM needs new resources, and quickly. The good news is that  there are currently 268 GW of new resources patiently waiting to come online in PJM, and 95% of those resources are clean. Adding even a fraction of this capacity would dramatically reduce prices. 

To estimate the potential cost savings, we constructed a “no backlog” scenario in which 30% of renewable projects that have been stuck in the queue for at least five years were instead assumed to be operational and had bid into the capacity market. The capacity value of these new resources would amount to an additional 7 GW of supply in the most recent auction. Adding just 7 GW of new entry could have lowered the market clearing price from $269.92/MW-day to as low as $98, or by as much as 63%. PJM delays in implementing interconnection queue reforms have effectively blocked new entry, driving up capacity costs and failing to mitigate the price impact for consumers. 


The 2025/2026 BRA cleared 135 GW of capacity at a price of $269.92/MW-day. This graph reconstructs the supply curve that produced actual clearing results compared to a “no backlog” supply scenario that includes 7 GW of capacity value from new renewable entry. Additional capacity from backlogged resources could have lowered the market clearing price to under $100/MW-day.

Credit:

NRDC

There are three things PJM can do to bring down prices. 

First, PJM must comply with FERC’s interconnection Order 2023 as soon as possible. PJM has refused to comply with the order so far, but after this auction it should be able to see the urgency of meaningful interconnection reform and comply as soon as possible. 

Second, the region needs new, well-planned transmission. A new report from Americans for a Clean Energy Grid shows that the rate of building new transmission lines is at an all-time low. If PJM’s transmission planning had a grade, it would get a D-. FERC Order 1920 charts a path toward the grid of the future and requires that RTOs, like PJM, create a process to plan for new transmission that provides regional benefits. Doing so will help to add many gigawatts of clean capacity to the power grid.

Third, PJM should examine market barriers that could be quickly fixed before the next capacity market auction in December. For example, customers in PJM currently pay hundreds of millions of dollars to keep at least two coal plants on-line for reliability reasons. Remarkably, neither of these plants bid into the capacity market this year, significantly tightening the supply in the region. PJM should require these plants, and another other future plants in such circumstances, to bid into the capacity market. If they did, customers in Maryland would have saved up to $18 per month, and the PJM region as a whole would have saved $5 billion. 

PJM has the tools in its toolbox to bring down prices and ensure a reliable, clean supply of electricity for years to come. If it acts now, these price increases can just be a bump in the road to a more affordable, resilient grid.

Russia restricts enriched uranium exports to the United States

https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/russia-restricts-enriched-uranium-exports-united-states-2024-11-15/

Russia restricts enriched uranium exports to the United States

By Reuters

 

Russia said the temporary restrictions were a response to Washington's ban on imports of Russian uranium, which was signed into law earlier this year, but contained waivers allowing for shipments to continue in case of supply concerns through 2027.

Russia is the world's sixth largest uranium producer and controls about 44% of global uranium enrichment capacity. In 2023, the U.S. and China topped the list of Russian uranium importers, followed by South Korea and France.

President Vladimir Putin told a government meeting on Sept. 11 that Moscow should consider limiting exports of uranium, titanium and nickel in retaliation for Western sanctions.

The government's decree on Friday was the first follow up action to Putin's statement in September.

Russia accounted for 27% of the enriched uranium supplied to U.S. commercial nuclear reactors last year. Imports to the U.S. from Russia through July this year stood at 313,050 kilograms (690,160 lb), down 30% from last year.

It is not clear whether the U.S. has imported any uranium from Russia after the U.S. ban took effect in August. The Russian government's decree says companies authorized by the export control watchdog can still export uranium to the United States.

The U.S. is probing a surge in imports of enriched uranium from China since late 2023 amid concerns the shipments are helping Moscow sidestep a U.S. ban on imports of the power plant fuel from Russia.

Beaver Valley Inoperable MSIV

Beaver Valley: MSIV FAILED TO CLOSE DURING SURVEILLANCE

57420

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Operations Center
 
EVENT REPORTS FOR
11/12/2024 - 11/13/2024
 
Power Reactor
Event Number: 57420
Facility: Beaver Valley
Region: 1     
State: PA
Unit: [2] [] []
RX Type: [1] W-3-LP,[2] W-3-LP
NRC Notified By: Shawn Keener
HQ OPS Officer: Robert A. Thompson
Notification Date: 11/12/2024
Notification Time: 01:21 [ET]
Event Date: 11/11/2024
Event Time: 17:31 [EST]
Last Update Date: 11/12/2024
Emergency Class: Non Emergency
10 CFR Section:
50.72(b)(2)(i) - Plant S/D Reqd By TS
50.72(b)(3)(v)(C) - Pot Uncntrl Rad Rel
50.72(b)(3)(v)(D) - Accident Mitigation
Person (Organization):
Schroeder, Dan (R1DO)
Power Reactor Unit Info
UnitSCRAM CodeRX CritInitial PWRInitial RX ModeCurrent PWRCurrent RX Mode
2NN0Hot Standby0Hot Standby
Event Text
MSIV FAILED TO CLOSE DURING SURVEILLANCE

The following information was provided by the licensee via phone and email:

"At 2250 EST on November 11, 2024, a technical specification required shutdown was initiated at Beaver Valley Power Station Unit 2. The following technical specification limiting conditions of operation (LCOs) were entered at 1939 EST on November 11, 2024:

"LCO 3.6.3, containment isolation valves, condition C, one or more penetration flow paths with one containment isolation valve inoperable; required action C.1, isolate the affected penetration flow path by use of at least one closed and de-activated automatic valve, closed manual valve, or blind flange.

"LCO 3.7.2, main steam isolation valves (MSIVs), condition C, one or more MSIVs inoperable in mode 2 or 3; required action C.1, close MSIV within 8 hours.

"These technical specification required actions will not be completed within the completion time; therefore, a technical specification required shutdown was initiated, and this event is being reported as a four-hour, non-emergency notification per 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(i).

"With one main steam isolation valve inoperable, this condition is also being reported as an eight-hour, non-emergency notification per 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v).

"There was no impact on the health and safety of the public or plant personnel.

"The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified."

The following additional information was obtained from the licensee in accordance with Headquarters Operations Officers Report Guidance:

The failure occurred during planned surveillance testing in preparation for reactor startup.

Tuesday, October 29, 2024

Waiver on Russ LEU issued to Centrus


Centrus receives waiver to import Russian uranium amid new ban
Staff Writer July 24, 2024


Centrus Energy has received a waiver from the US Department of Energy (DOE) allowing it to import low-enriched uranium (LEU) from Russia for delivery to US customers in 2024 and 2025.
The Prohibiting Russian Uranium Imports Act was signed by President Joe Biden in May, after being passed unanimously by the US Senate and will go into effect on 11 August.  It bans the import of unirradiated, LEU that is produced in the Russian Federation or by a Russian entity.  The ban will remain in place until the end of 2040.
The waiver process was put in place to ensure US NPPs do not face supply disruptions while the US works to build up its domestic LEU capacity.  According to the US Energy Information Administration, Russia has been supplying about 24% of enriched uranium used to fuel the US fleet of 94 commercial reactors with 12% coming from Germany and 11% from the UK. and 27% produced in the US.  DOE says Russia has roughly 44% of the world’s uranium enrichment capacity and supplies approximately 35% of US imports for nuclear fuel.  The only commercial enrichment operation in the US is Urenco’s facility in New Mexico which began operations in 2010, Urenco is jointly owned by the UK, Germany and the Netherlands.
Waivers to allow the import of limited quantities of Russian-origin material may be granted by the US Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Commerce, if it is determined that no alternative viable source of LEU is available, or that the importation of Russian LEU is in the national interest.  Waivers will only be available until 1 January 2028.
Centrus filed its first waiver request application – covering deliveries from 11 August 2024 to the end of 2027 – on 27 May.  DOE has issued a waiver allowing it to import LEU from Russia “for deliveries already committed by the Company to its US customers in years 2024 and 2025,” the company said in a US Securities and Exchange Commission filing.  Centrus said DOE has deferred a decision on 2026 and 2027 to “an unspecified date closer in time to the deliveries”.
A decision from DOE is still awaited for a second waiver application to allow the importation of LEU from Russia for processing and re-export to Centrus’s foreign customers.  The application was filed on 7 June.  Centrus also plans to file a third waiver request application to allow for importation of LEU from Russia in 2026 and 2027 for use in the USA.  This would be for deliveries that have yet to be committed to customers

_____________________________________
Real climate solutions are NOT radioactive.
The genome is the REAL dosimeter.
_______________________________________
 Fission energy is safe if and only if all devices work, everybody does their job, no plant or repository is in any battle — conventional or not, and no quantity of fissionable material is in the hands of the ignorant   No Acts of God  

Investigation of Michigan nuclear power plant reveals extensive safety issues | Michigan | thecentersquare.com

Investigation of Michigan nuclear power plant reveals extensive safety issues
​​​​​​​


Donna

Tuesday, October 22, 2024

Power Demand from Data Centers Keeping Coal-Fired Plants Online

https://www.powermag.com/power-demand-from-data-centers-keeping-coal-fired-plants-online/

Power Demand from Data Centers Keeping Coal-Fired Plants Online

Oct 16, 2024

by Darrell Proctor

The power generation sector is looking at numerous ways to provide enough electricity to satisfy demand from data centers. Bloomberg Intelligence recently said its research shows data centers, buildings filled with servers and other computing equipment for data storage and networking that supports operations and artificial intelligence (AI), could be responsible for as much as 17% of all U.S. electricity consumption by 2030. The U.S. Dept. of Energy (DOE) has said one data center can require 50 times the electricity of a typical office building.

Several technology groups are looking at nuclear powerincluding the use of small modular reactors (SMRs), to meet their electricity needs. Energy analysts have said natural gas, whether burned in large-scale facilities or peaker plants, also will be important.

Power consumption from data centers, though, also is benefiting coal-fired power plants, some of which may be kept running longer than expected in order to meet the increased demand for electricity from companies such as Google, Meta, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and others. Some coal-fired plants already have gotten a reprieve in areas where more energy is needed as data centers come online, or are in the planning stages.

The topic reportedly was discussed when C-suite executives from Alphabet (Google), AWS, Microsoft, Meta, Nvidia, and OpenAI met with government officials in Washington, D.C., last month to discuss ways to support U.S. infrastructure for AI, including data centers. Part of the discussion was about repurposing old coal sites as data center campuses. The DOE has said it will share resources with data center developers about how to repurpose former coal mines, or coal-fired power plants, to be home to data centers. Energy DELTA Lab, a collaborative effort that includes Dominion Energy Virginia and Appalachian Power, already is working on the Data Center Ridge project at a former mining site in Wise County, Virginia.

Life Extension

Maksim Sonin, an energy expert who has collaborated with several companies, including Chevron and Shell, and is a Sloan Fellow at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business, said, “Driven by recent trends in AI development, projected power consumption by data centers in the U.S. is expected to increase in the range from 8% to 17% by 2030—or potentially even higher, as progress in AI technologies is not linear but exponential, as seen in Silicon Valley today.” Sonin told POWER, “With this sharp upward trend, it is highly likely that coal-fired power plants will remain a part of the U.S. energy system for longer, although their role is expected to diminish,” as more renewable and other energy resources come online.

“Coal plants will have an extension of their life due to data center demand,” said Tim Echols, a commissioner and vice-chair of the Georgia Public Service Commission. Echols’ home state is actively recruiting data centers and manufacturing facilities to provide jobs and boost local economies. It already added a significant new source of power when two nuclear reactors entered service at Plant Vogtle last year and this year, providing about 2,200 MW of new electricity output in the state. Plant Vogtle, where two other reactors have operated since the 1980s, is now the nation’s largest nuclear power plant, with more than 4,600 MW of generation capacity.

Echols told POWER in an Oct. 16 interview that Georgia is preparing for a large increase in power demand. “There could be a massive increase of capacity approved next year. Data centers will account for most of it,” he said.

How to satisfy data center power demand is being discussed by utilities and energy officials nationwide. Allan Schurr, chief commercial officer with Texas-based Enchanted Rock, which provides microgrid backup power solutions to data centers and other critical infrastructure, said the debate also should include onsite generation.

“AI data centers require more generating capacity—that’s a given,” said Schurr. “While we are waiting for nuclear power to bring substantial additional baseload to the grid, we don’t want to needlessly ‘recarbonize’ our energy resources by extending the life of older, less-efficient fossil generation plants like coal.

Schurr told POWER, “Today’s grid has significant available capacity with the exception of about 500 hours per year that can be mitigated with dispatchable generation. And the grid needs those 500 hours of additional capacity so we can continue to add solar and wind resources into the energy mix. Data centers can facilitate this dispatchable generation from their own onsite generation, making them assets to the grid instead of liabilities.”

The utilities and grid operators arguing to keep coal-fired plants online say it makes sense to keep existing baseload power sources operating, at least until more nuclear or renewable energy is available. That’s why states including Nebraska, Virginia, and Utah among others, have plans to keep coal-fired units running to support the supply of electricity.

Virginia is World Data Center Leader

DC Byte, a UK-based research group that tracks data centers worldwide, has said the U.S. is the world leader in the buildout of data centers. The group said Virginia—home to about half of all U.S. data centers—is the largest data center market worldwide. Loudoun County in Virginia is known as “Data Center Alley.”

PJM Interconnection, the grid operator that serves Virginia, the District of Columbia, and 12 other states, has conceded some coal-fired power plants will need to continue operating, and miles of new transmission lines must be built, to satisfy ever-increasing demand for electricity. Other power sources will help—Japan’s Sumitomo Corp. on Tuesday announced it will partner with CEP Solar (based in Richmond, Virginia) to add 1.5 GW of solar and battery energy storage to support data center growth in the region.

“The system is in a major transition right now, and it’s going to continue to evolve,” Ken Seiler, PJM’s senior vice president in charge of planning, said in a December stakeholders’ meeting about how the grid operator can supply more power as it waits for more renewable energy resources to come online. “And we’ll look for opportunities to do everything we can to keep the lights on as it goes through this transition.”

DC Byte in its 2024 Global Data Center Index wrote, “Virginia currently has over 6 GW in the development pipeline including projects under active construction as well as Committed and Early Stage campuses.” The group noted, “Cloud is the greatest driver of growth in Virginia. AWS [Amazon Web Services] operates over 40 facilities in the state and Microsoft operates a massive campus in Boydton as well as a smaller facility in Loudoun County. Both companies have more self-build campuses in the pipeline and are also major colocation tenants across the market.”

DC Byte added, “In 2022, Loudoun County’s primary power supplier Dominion Energy announced that it would not be able to meet power demand in the market. Delays in power delivery are expected until 2025 or 2026 while new power infrastructure is built. In the meantime, Dominion Energy would be providing power incrementally.” Dominion officials have said they project that power demand in the utility’s territory will increase by 85% over the next 15 years.

The 1,100-MW Fort Martin Power Station is located in Maidsville, West Virginia, on the Monongahela River. It has two coal-fired units. It is owned by Monongahela Power (Mon Power), part of FirstEnergy Corp. Source: Mon PowerThe 1,100-MW Fort Martin Power Station is located in Maidsville, West Virginia, on the Monongahela River. It has two coal-fired units. It is owned by Monongahela Power (Mon Power), part of FirstEnergy Corp. Source: Mon Power

PJM is backing a $5.2 billion plan for new transmission lines across several states to bring power to Virginia. The lines would carry electricity produced at several coal-fired power plants that have been slated for closure, including the Longview, Fort Martin, and Harrison stations in West Virginia.

In Maryland, meanwhile, PJM has asked Texas-based Talen Energy Corp. to keep Brandon Shores and Herbert A. Wagner—two other coal-fired facilities located near Baltimore—online at least through 2028. The plants had been scheduled to close by June 2025.

Operating Extension for Omaha Coal Plant

The 644-MW North Omaha Station in Nebraska was scheduled to close in 2023. Instead, Google and Meta data centers caused the area’s power demand to spike, which led the Omaha Public Power District to decide that the two coal-fired units at North Omaha were needed to maintain reliability of the local power grid. The utility has said it will keep the coal-burning units online at least through 2026.

One Google data center is in Papillon, a town about 12 miles southwest of Omaha. DC Byte said the Google facility uses more power than the Meta office, and added that its data shows Google uses more electricity in Nebraska than it uses elsewhere in the U.S. The company also is planning more data centers in the state.

Data from Meta and other groups shows that the company’s data center in Sarpy County, about 25 miles southwest of Omaha, last year used almost as much power as the North Omaha station produced. The Meta campus includes nine separate complexes, encompassing about 4 million square feet.

The Omaha Public Power District has estimated that as much as two-thirds of the projected growth in power demand around Omaha will come from data centers, which are being built on what used to be farmland. Local officials have said opposition to wind and solar farms in rural areas has curtailed additional renewable energy resources that could supply power. The utility has been developing a 2,800-acre solar power project in rural York County, about 100 miles from Omaha, but area residents have voiced concerns about the installation. The utility also has said regulatory issues have slowed plans to replace coal-fired generation with natural gas-fired units.

Meta’s presence in Omaha was sought by state and local officials; a special electricity rate for industrial customers was created in 2017. That rate was then marketed to Google to entice the search engine giant to build in the area.

Georgia Courting Data Center Operators

Georgia Power is buying electricity from a sister company, Mississippi Power (both are part of Southern Co.), to help meet power demand in Georgia. The deal came after Georgia Power officials reportedly told state regulators that growing demand for electricity would overrun supply by year-end 2025. Georgia officials have been actively looking to bring data centers and manufacturing plants to that state, and Gov. Brian Kemp earlier this year vetoed a bill that would have suspended a tax break for data centers (the bill had bipartisan opposition). Had the bill become law, the tax break would have been under the review of a special commission on data center energy planning.

Kemp in a statement said, “The bill’s language would prevent the issuance of exemption certificates after an abrupt July 1, 2024 deadline for many customers of projects that are already in development—undermining the investments made by high-technology data center operators, customers, and other stakeholders in reliance on the recent extension, and inhibiting important infrastructure and job development.”

Georgia Power has a deal with Mississippi Power to buy 750 MW of electricity through 2028. Mississippi Power is providing the energy from its Victor J. Daniel Electric Generating Plant, better known as Plant Daniel, where two coal-fired units have operated for the past 50 years. The plant also has two natural gas combined-cycle units. It is the state’s largest power plant, with nearly 1.6 GW of generation capacity, including 500 MW from its two coal-fired units.

Mississippi Power had planned to retire the coal-burning steam turbines in 2027. The deal with Georgia Power, though, could extend that lifecycle. Jeffrey Grubb, the utility’s director of resource planning, reportedly was asked by Georgia Power’s lawyers about the agreement, and said, “Because those units would have been either retired or sold off-system and we needed certainty that they would be there to serve our customers.”

Echols, the PUC co-chair, on Wednesday told POWER the contract with Mississippi Power is open to any kind of generation source.

“Our contract with Mississippi Power calls for 750 MW, and it doesn’t matter where it comes from. That may mean an [operating] extension for the coal plant, or it may not,” he said. “Mississippi could do 750 MW of solar plus storage, they could bring in 750 MW of wind power from a neighboring state.”

Echols noted that a move by regulators in 2022 extended operations for two coal-fired units at Georgia Power’s Plant Bowen, one of the nation’s largest coal-burning power plants, with about 3.4 GW of generation capacity. Echols said, “In the 2022 IRP [integrated resource plan] … our commissioners delayed the closure of units 1 and 2 at Plant Bowen. I imagine as we evaluate that in next year’s IRP, we will also delay the closure for another three years. We’ll have to wait and see what the utility is asking for and how the commissioners feel we need to move forward.”

Echols told POWER, “There could be a massive increase of capacity approved next year. Data centers will account for most of it.” Echols also offered, “I think there is a scenario where we approve two more AP1000 [reactors] at Plant Vogtle if the federal government provides bankruptcy insurance or overrun insurance” for another expansion at the site.

Other Efforts

DC Byte has identified Salt Lake City, Utah, as a growing market for data centers. Meta already operates a 4.5-million-square foot complex in Eagle Mountain, Utah, south of Salt Lake City.

State lawmakers have pushed legislation to keep the Intermountain Power Project, a coal-fired station near Delta, Utah, open past the facility’s scheduled 2025 closure date. Officials have looked at ways to have the state take over the plant. Lawmakers this year did pass legislation intended to extend the life of Rocky Mountain Power’s coal-fired stations in Emery County.

Stuart Adams, president of the Utah Senate, during the legislative session this summer said, “The United States has a real problem. We do not have enough power for our data centers. AI development is technology that we have to embrace, and power is the key to it.”

Building more infrastructure to support that AI development was among the reasons those tech company execs met last month on Capitol Hill. Reports said the discussion included repurposing former coal sites to house data center campuses, in part because those sites usually have access to power lines, water, and a local workforce.

The DOE’s Pacific Northwest National Lab, which is leading the “coal-to-X” redevelopment campaign, in a guide to the program wrote, “A retired coal site could even be redeveloped to combine a data center with new clean energy on the same site.”

As Schurr of Enchanted Rock noted, generating onsite power via a microgrid, or through a renewable energy resource, could be preferable to using coal-fired generation. That’s of particular importance for data center operators looking to build in remote areas where they need plenty of land, and where there’s a lack of transmission infrastructure.

Sonin reiterated that coal will play a role in satisfying power demand from data centers, but like Schurr, noted other fuels could work with coal to reduce the environmental impact of keeping coal-fired power plants online.

Sonin told POWER, “Emerging technologies that, for instance, allow for substituting some of the coal with ammonia, a carbon-free hydrogen derivative, through a process known as co-firing, may help address public environmental concerns. Current advancements, particularly the potential for upscaling production trains, could reduce the cost of ammonia facilities by 30% and more, making this chemical a viable solution for cutting emissions from coal plants.”

Darrell Proctor is a senior editor for POWER


Tim Judson

Executive Director

Nuclear Information and Resource Service

6930 Carroll Avenue, Suite 340

Takoma Park, MD  20912

Pronouns: he/him/his

O: 301-270-6477

E: timj@nirs.org

W: www.nirs.org

$100 M transformer ordered for Three Mile Island Constellation Energy has ordered a main power transformer for the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor in Pennsylvania

USA, Pennsylvania: Constellation Energy has ordered a main power transformer for the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor in Pennsylvania. The company is attempting to restart the reactor, pushing ahead with work critical to the plant’s revival.

The transformer will be the biggest single piece of equipment which will need to be replaced for restart of the plant, and it will cost about $100 million. The owner of the plant Constellation is investing $1.6 billion to revive the operation over the next four years.

When deciding whether to move forward with a restart, Constellation surveyed the site to determine the condition of essential infrastructure and equipment, much of which has sat idle since the plant shut in 2019. Constellation Vice President of Generation Bryan Hanson said that the plant is in great condition.

Constellation signed a 20-year power contract with Microsoft to help restart the plant. The nuclear reactor, located on an island in the Susquehanna River in Pennsylvania, could supply 835 MW of power to offset Microsoft’s data center electricity consumption.

No modern US nuclear power plant has been restarted after fully shutting down. Three Mile Island is known as the site of the worst nuclear power accident in US history, as in 1979, a unit experienced a partial meltdown which caused no deaths but released small amounts of radioactive gases and raised concerns about the potential health effects on surrounding communities. That unit will not be restarted.

Separate Unit 1, which Constellation wants to resurrect, shut in 2019 for economic reasons. Unit 1 could begin producing power in 2028, but there is a series of physical hurdles and US and local regulations that must be completed first. Among other investments in resuming operations at the plant are work on the reactor’s turbine, generator, and cooling systems.

Source: Reuters

Corrected Link: Three Mile Island Restart Mtg - Friday 9:00 am ET Webinar - Please Be There

Dear No Nuke Community,

Please show up this Friday 10/25 at 9:00am ET.  Registration required - Please share
The purpose for the meeting is for the Constellation Energy Generation, LLC to provide an overview of their plan to potentially restart Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, as well as to rename the facility to Crane Clean Energy Center. This is a Hybrid Meeting.

Teleconference:
Bridge Number Conference        ID Pass Code
(301) 576-2978                           759137601#


Meeting Number 
250 970 214 041

Password
6JBzJV

This meeting will be hybrid. Please register in advance of the meeting by clicking on the
provided link. This will take you to a new page where you will be asked to provide some
basic information, including an email address, so that the system can send you the
Microsoft Teams link for the meeting. We ask that you do this in advance (at least 30
minutes) to provide the system time to send the link before the meeting starts.

10/25/24
9:00AM -
11:00AM ET

Meeting info
The purpose for the meeting is for the Constellation Energy Generation, LLC to provide an overview of their plan to potentially restart Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, as well as to rename the facility to Crane Clean Energy Center. This is a Hybrid Meeting. [more...]

Participation: Observation

Teleconference


One White Flint
11555 Rockville Pike
O-8B4
Rockville MD


Justin Poole
(301) 415-2048

Ngola Otto
(301) 415-6695


N2
Michael J. Keegan
Don't Waste Michigan

Friday, October 18, 2024

Pre-registration is requested for Constellation's overview of their plan to potentially restart Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1. (October 25, 2024.)




"The site of the worst nuclear accident in U.S. history is poised to get a rebranding."

 The site of the worst nuclear accident in U.S. history is poised to get a rebranding
  • Updated: Oct. 18, 2024, 5:11 a.m.
  • |Published: Oct. 18, 2024, 5:10 a.m.
 
Constellation Energy has reached an agreement with Microsoft to launch the Crane Clean Energy Center and restart Three Mile Island Unit 1 back to service and online producing electricity in 2028. October 16, 2024. Dan Gleiter | dgleiter@pennlive.comDan Gleiter | dgleiter@pennlive.com
​​​​​​​
By 
Some of the most recognizable U.S. companies have changed their names over the years for a variety of reasons:
Facebook changed to Meta to reflect its focus on creating a metaverse.

Campbell Soup Company switched to The Campbell’s Company to reflect its wider selection of products.
Dunkin’ Donuts went simply to Dunkin’ to modernize its brand.

Now Constellation Energy wants to change the name of Three Mile Island Nuclear Station.

After all, who wouldn’t want to bury the name attached to the worst nuclear disaster on American soil?
But Constellation’s chief generation officer Bryan Hanson denied that’s the reason the company wants to adopt a new name: Crane Clean Energy Center.

The company, which owns the shuttered nuclear plant, plans to bring the proposal before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for approval on Oct. 25, along with an overview of the plans to restart the nuclear reactor.

Three Mile Island Unit 1 to go online in 2028

“Crane” is a tribute to Chris Crane, the CEO of Constellation’s former parent company who died in April after distinguishing himself as a leader in nuclear energy.

“We’re recognizing a titan of the nuclear industry that established high standards for not only the U.S. but the world to operate these nuclear plants,” Hanson said.

“We’re dedicating this plant in his name because fundamentally we expect to do the same with this plant – restore it to as good as it was when we shut it down, to establish the high levels of reliability and standards that it operated to, and operate [it] for the next 20 plus years. That’s important to us.”

As for including “clean energy” in the proposed name, he said this plant will produce massive amounts of electricity without carbon emissions and at a level of reliability independent of the weather, the sun or pipelines.

“There’s no other industry that makes electricity that can account for every gram of waste and account for it both responsibly and financially like we do,” Hanson said. “We’re very confident in our ability to say clean energy.”

Nuclear energy watchdog Eric Epstein has a hard time accepting that rationale.

“What is ‘clean’ about radioactive waste? You can call TMI whatever you want, but the fact remains that it is a radioactive garbage dump,” he said. “The priority should be cleaning up Three Mile Island, rather than rebranding a nuclear waste site.”

Marketing expert Bo Bothe, president and CEO of BrandExtract of Houston, Texas, said he can’t blame Constellation for seeking a new name for the plant.

“This site has been branded as a failure for America and a danger for so long that you’ve got to overcome that somehow,” he said.
However, changing the name alone isn’t enough to change someone’s perception of the plant or any brand for that matter —that takes time and money, Bothe said.

Three Mile Island carries a lot of baggage with residents in central Pennsylvania, who are haunted by the trauma of the partial meltdown 45 years ago when 100,000 people were forced to flee.

Changing perceptions also requires working with the community, communication, safety assurances, and living up to its promises for the new brand to take hold, he said.

Constellation is seeking the NRC’s approval to bring Unit 1 back online by 2028, that would be nine years after the plant was shut down amid financial woes. Microsoft entered into a 20-year agreement with Constellation to buy all the zero-emission energy the plant produces to help meet the tech company’s pledge of becoming carbon negative by 2030.

Bothe said given Microsoft’s carbon reduction pledge, it’s understandable Constellation wants clean energy in the name. Naming the plant after a person known for helping to shape the nuclear energy also is understandable.

But he added, “The challenge is this site has already been branded and how do you change that perception. It’s pretty risky for Microsoft to have an association there because if there is a failure, it really will affect Microsoft’s brand. Hopefully, they’ve taken all that into account and not just think oh, this would be cheaper to redo a plant” than build new.

Hanson said Constellation’s request to change the plant’s name isn’t an effort to erase the plant’s history.

Rather, he said, “I’m hoping to move past it and recognize it for what it was and what it did for the industry to create such high level performance across not only our nation but the world. If you think about where nuclear has come from since that accident in ’79, no one can argue that we haven’t learned the lessons, that we have better operator training, that we have better reliability, better oversight, the whole soup to nuts.

“Nuclear is in a much stronger position than in ’79.”

THREE MILE ISLAND RESTART
 

Thursday, October 17, 2024

Notice of Meeting with Constellation Energy Generation, LLC

SUBJECT:  Notice of Meeting with Constellation Energy Generation, LLC

ADAMS Accession No. ML24289A126
 Using Web-based ADAMS, select “Advanced Search”
Under “Property,” select “Accession Number”
Under “Value,” enter the Accession Number
Click Search

Amazon and Energy Northwest announce plans to develop advanced nuclear technology in Washington

https://www.energy-northwest.com/whoweare/news-and-info/Pages/Amazon-and-Energy-Northwest-announce-plans-to-develop--advanced-nuclear-technology-in-Washington.aspx

Amazon and Energy Northwest announce plans to develop advanced nuclear technology in Washington

10/16/2024
News Release

RICHLAND, Wash. – Amazon (Nasdaq; AMZN) and Energy Northwest, a public power agency leading in the development of next-generation nuclear technologies, today announced an agreement to fund efforts to move toward development and deployment of small modular reactor (SMR) technology in Washington state to advance reliable energy across the Northwest.

As the demand for energy resources continue to rise, Energy Northwest and Amazon recognize the urgent need to develop advanced technologies in the Pacific Northwest that provide reliable, carbon-free and sustainable energy generation. SMRs offer a promising solution to that need through scalable and flexible energy output.

Through the agreement, Amazon will fund the initial feasibility phase of an SMR project, which is planned to be sited near Energy Northwest's Columbia Generating Station nuclear energy facility in Richland, Washington.

“As a member of Washington's business community, Amazon is committed to investing in new nuclear energy technologies that can help power our operations and provide net-new, safe sources of carbon-free energy to the grid," said Kevin Miller, Amazon's Vice President of Global Data Centers. “We're proud to be working with Energy Northwest, a utility company that's also thinking big about meeting society's growing energy demands while addressing climate change. This new SMR project is a significant step toward Amazon's Climate Pledge commitment to reach net-zero carbon across our operations by 2040, and signifies our continued dedication to becoming a more sustainable company."

“We are excited about this collaboration with Amazon and are impressed with their vision for helping develop new nuclear technologies and their desire to also make this resource available to utilities in the future," said Greg Cullen, Vice President for Energy Services & Development at Energy Northwest. “We've been working for years to develop this project at the urging of our members, and have found that taking this first, bold step is difficult for utilities, especially those that provide electricity to ratepayers at the cost of production. We applaud Amazon for being willing to use their financial strength, need for power and know-how to lead the way to a reliable, carbon-free power future for the region."

The SMRs will be the Xe-100 design, a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor developed by X-energy, a global leader in advanced nuclear reactor and fuel technology. Each Xe-100 module can provide 80 megawatts of full-time electricity. Energy Northwest and X-energy have engaged extensively on plans for an Xe-100 facility since 2020.
Under the agreement, Amazon will have the right to purchase electricity from the first project (four modules), which is expected to generate 320 megawatts (MW) of energy capacity. Energy Northwest has the option to further build out the site by adding up to eight additional modules (640 MWs) resulting in a total project generating capacity of up to 960 MWs. This additional power will be available to Amazon and northwest utilities to power homes and businesses.

As the owner and operator of Columbia Generating Station, the Pacifi​c Northwest's only nuclear generating facility, and as a developer and operator of additional clean energy and storage resources, Energy Northwest is well-equipped to develop this project.

This collaboration between Energy Northwest and Amazon demonstrates the power of public-private partnerships in driving innovation and accelerating the progression of sustainable energy solutions. It also paves the way for public power entities to develop and build future SMRs to help meet the region's growing energy demands.

Amazon press release

X-energy press release 

Media Kit 
 
Additional Attributable Quotes

"One of the greatest concerns for community-owned electric utilities is having access to reliable sources of electricity that fulfill carbon-free energy mandates. Advanced nuclear fits the bill. This bold partnership between Energy Northwest and Amazon will help pave the way for additional nuclear development in our region and represents a critical step toward achieving a clean and dependable electric grid."
-Kurt Miller, Executive Director, Northwest Public Power Association
---------

“It is essential that American energy, American technology and American innovation continues to set the standard for the rest of the world. Our community is poised to become the center of that innovation, for everything from information, energy and agricultural technologies. These opportunities will positively shape the future of our nation, our state and our families' lives. 

However, without the electricity to attract industry and grow our communities, our collective goals will never be realized. Investments like these, where end-users, government and industry step up to the plate and help build the critical infrastructure that will propel us all into the future is an investment that cannot be understated. 

The Central Washington Building Trades Unions have worked tirelessly to grow and train the skilled workforce of the next generation. The future of our community will be built by talented Building Trades Union members and their families that live here.

The way I see it we must have two things, the people to build the future and the energy to power it. The Central Washington Building Trades is committed to supply the next generation of skilled crafts to build the future and this investment represents an important commitment to power it."
-Nickolas A. Bumpaous, President Central Washington Building Trades and Business Manager for UA Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union 598
---------

“The Pacific Northwest region will need a remarkable amount of electricity to meet a projected increase in demand due to data center development, high-tech manufacturing growth and the continued trend toward electrification. At the same time, the region is on a path to reducing carbon emissions to address the disastrous effects of climate change. The path must include many solutions, like dependable generation that can back-up variable wind and solar power resources to assure an adequate, reliable power supply. Energy Northwest's pro-active decision making and partnership with Amazon makes substantial progress toward modernizing and decarbonizing the region's power system."
-Crystal Ball, Executive Director Pacific Northwest Utilities Conference Committee
---------

"Amazon's announced investment in small modular reactors gives me hope for the future of the Northwest power grid. Under 100% non-emitting electricity requirements, nuclear power is the only technology capable of reliably delivering the massive amounts of around-the-clock energy our society needs, while also positioning utilities to meet aggressive electrification goals. I am ecstatic and deeply grateful to Amazon for their bold and visionary leadership."
-Rick Dunn, General Manager, Benton Public Utility District

Media contacts:

Energy Northwest:

Kelly Rae

Corporate Communications

klrae@energy-northwest.com

 

Amazon:

Erika Reynoso

Corporate Communications

ermreyno@amazon.com

About Energy Northwest       
Energy Northwest is a Washington state public power joint operating agency and a premier provider of carbon-free electricity. Energy Northwest comprises 29 public power member utilities, serving more than 1.5 million customers, and provides its members and regional customers with safe, reliable, cost-effective, responsible power generation and innovative energy and business solutions. The agency owns and operates hydroelectric, solar, battery storage, wind and the Northwest's only nuclear power facility. Energy Northwest also actively supports transportation electrification and new generation projects to the benefit of public power. www.energy-northwest.com.        

About Amazon
Amazon is guided by four principles: customer obsession rather than competitor focus, passion for invention, commitment to operational excellence, and long-term thinking. Amazon strives to be Earth's Most Customer-Centric Company, Earth's Best Employer, and Earth's Safest Place to Work. Customer reviews, 1-Click shopping, personalized recommendations, Prime, Fulfillment by Amazon, AWS, Kindle Direct Publishing, Kindle, Career Choice, Fire tablets, Fire TV, Amazon Echo, Alexa, Just Walk Out technology, Amazon Studios, and The Climate Pledge are some of the things pioneered by Amazon. For more information, visit amazon.com/about and follow @AmazonNews.​