Incident Chronology at TMI from NRC: 1979-2014
March 28, 1979, 4:00 a.m. - Beginning of the Three Mile Island (TMI)
Unit-2 loss-of-coolant, core melt accident. The plant came within 30
minutes of a full meltdown. The reactor vessel was destroyed, and large
amounts of unmonitored radiation was released directly into the
community.
March 28, 1979, 4:30 p.m. - Press conference of Lt. Governor William Scranton:
This is an update on the incident at Three-Mile Island Nuclear Power
Plant today. This situation is more complex than the company first led
us to believe. We are taking more tests. And at this point, we believe
there is still no danger to public health. Metropolitan Edison has given
you and us conflicting information. We just concluded a meeting with
company officials and hope this briefing will clear up most of your
questions. There has been a release of radioactivity into the
environment. The magnitude of this release is still being determined,
but there is no evidence yet that it has resulted in the presence of
dangerous levels. The company has informed us that from about 11 a.m.
until about 1:30 p.m., Three-Mile Island discharged into the air, steam
that contained detectable amounts of radiation.
March 30, 1979 - Governor Richard Thornburgh recommended an
evacuation for preschool children and pregnant women living within five
miles of the plant. Out of a target population of 5,000, over 140,000
Central Pennsylvanians fled the area. Schools in the area closed...
The U.S. House of Representatives committee examining reporting information during the accident concluded:
The record indicates that in reporting to State and federal officials
on March 28, 1979, TMI managers did not communicate information in
their possession that they understood to be related to the severity of
the situation. The lack of such information prevented State and federal
officials from accurately assessing the condition of the plant. In
addition, the record indicates that TMI managers presented State and
federal officials misleading statements (i.e. statements that were
inaccurate and incomplete) that conveyed the impression the accident was
substantially less severe and the situation more under control than
what the managers themselves believed and what was in fact the case.
Download Document
Sunday, July 27, 2014
Incident Chronology at Susquehanna Steam Electric Station in Berwick: 2010 - 2011
Incident Chronology at Susquehanna Steam Electric Station in Berwick: 2010- 2011
CHRONOLOGY of PROBLEMS at the SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION
This chronology does not include the cost to the rate payer
to build Susquehanna-1 and -2. PP&L asked the Public Utility
Commission (PUC) for $315 million to recover the cost of
building Unit-1. The PUC granted $203 million on August 22,
1983, or a 16% increase to the customer. The company asked for
$330 million for Unit-2 but was allowed $121 million in April,
1985; an 8% increase to rate payers. In addition, PP&L
consumers have “contributed” approximately $4.6 million
annually (since 1985) to the decommissioning fund.
(Also, refer to May 15 and August 13, 1998, for information
on “stranded costs” passed on to “hostage” PP&L rate payers.)
Moreover, in the Winter 1999/2000, PPL unilaterally
devaluated the combined PURTA and Real Estate tax
assessments for the SSES. Prior to the Negotiated Settlement,
the nuclear power generating stations were assessed by PP&L at
approximately $1 billion. PPL is now claiming that the the SSES
is only worth $74 million or the same amount as the valuation of
the Columbia Hospital. If PPL prevails, the Berwick School
District and Luzerne County will experience revenue shock. PPL
is not paying or escrowing any moneys they owe to Luzerne
County and the Berwick School District.
Download Document
CHRONOLOGY of PROBLEMS at the SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION
This chronology does not include the cost to the rate payer
to build Susquehanna-1 and -2. PP&L asked the Public Utility
Commission (PUC) for $315 million to recover the cost of
building Unit-1. The PUC granted $203 million on August 22,
1983, or a 16% increase to the customer. The company asked for
$330 million for Unit-2 but was allowed $121 million in April,
1985; an 8% increase to rate payers. In addition, PP&L
consumers have “contributed” approximately $4.6 million
annually (since 1985) to the decommissioning fund.
(Also, refer to May 15 and August 13, 1998, for information
on “stranded costs” passed on to “hostage” PP&L rate payers.)
Moreover, in the Winter 1999/2000, PPL unilaterally
devaluated the combined PURTA and Real Estate tax
assessments for the SSES. Prior to the Negotiated Settlement,
the nuclear power generating stations were assessed by PP&L at
approximately $1 billion. PPL is now claiming that the the SSES
is only worth $74 million or the same amount as the valuation of
the Columbia Hospital. If PPL prevails, the Berwick School
District and Luzerne County will experience revenue shock. PPL
is not paying or escrowing any moneys they owe to Luzerne
County and the Berwick School District.
Download Document
Friday, July 25, 2014
Peach Bottom Atomic Station, Units 2 and 3 - Staff Assessment of the Flooding Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima DAI-ICHI Nuclear Power Plant Accident (Tac Nos. MF0261 and MF0262)
Peach Bottom Atomic Station, Units 2 and 3 - Staff Assessment of the
Flooding Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task
Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima DAI-ICHI Nuclear Power
Plant Accident (Tac Nos. MF0261 and MF0262)
Download ML14119A057
Download ML14119A057
Three Mile Island, Unit 1 - Staff Assessment of the Flooding Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident (Tac No. MF0290)
Three Mile Island, Unit 1 - Staff Assessment of the Flooding Walkdown
Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation
2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident (Tac
No. MF0290)
Download ML14156A238
Download ML14156A238
Thursday, July 24, 2014
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, Staff Assessment of The Flooding Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to The Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident (MF0288 and MF0289)
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, Staff Assessment
of The Flooding Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term
Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to The Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear
Power Plant Accident (MF0288 and MF0289)
Download ML14156A234
Download ML14156A234
Tuesday, July 22, 2014
Petition to consider new and significant information on the environmental impacts of high-density pool storage
San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace among 34 organizations demanding the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission consider new and significant information on the environmental impacts of high-density pool storage.
For immediate release: July 2, 2014
CONTACTS:
Linda Seeley, Spokesperson
Jane Swanson, Spokesperson
San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace (SLOMFP) is among 34 organizations filing an amended rulemaking petition on June 26, 2014. The amended petition supplements the rulemaking petition filed on February 18, which asks the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to revise its environmental analysis of “spent” fuel storage impacts based on new and significant information generated in the NRC’s Expedited Spent Fuel Transfer proceeding. In that proceeding, the NRC admitted for the first time how devastating the impacts of a pool fire could be, i.e., thousands of square miles contaminated, millions of people relocated. It also conceded that transferring spent fuel from high-density pools to dry storage could be a cost-effective mitigative measure. The 34 organizations, represented by SLOMFP attorney Diane Curran and Mindy Goldstein of Emory Law School, argue that this information must be considered before licensing or re-licensing any nuclear reactors.
See the Amended Petition at http://www.nirs.org/radwaste/atreactorstorage/2014-06-26amendedpetitionforrulemaking.pdf
For immediate release: July 2, 2014
CONTACTS:
Linda Seeley, Spokesperson
Jane Swanson, Spokesperson
San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace (SLOMFP) is among 34 organizations filing an amended rulemaking petition on June 26, 2014. The amended petition supplements the rulemaking petition filed on February 18, which asks the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to revise its environmental analysis of “spent” fuel storage impacts based on new and significant information generated in the NRC’s Expedited Spent Fuel Transfer proceeding. In that proceeding, the NRC admitted for the first time how devastating the impacts of a pool fire could be, i.e., thousands of square miles contaminated, millions of people relocated. It also conceded that transferring spent fuel from high-density pools to dry storage could be a cost-effective mitigative measure. The 34 organizations, represented by SLOMFP attorney Diane Curran and Mindy Goldstein of Emory Law School, argue that this information must be considered before licensing or re-licensing any nuclear reactors.
See the Amended Petition at http://www.nirs.org/radwaste/atreactorstorage/2014-06-26amendedpetitionforrulemaking.pdf
Tuesday, July 1, 2014
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS & RESPONSE NEW
An Update To The On-going Revision to NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1
Development of draft Revision 2 of NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 continued during the 1st quar- ter of calendar year 2014 in preparation for the formal public comment period, which is scheduled to start in Octo- ber 2014. A preliminary draft of Section I was developed and changes to the evaluation criteria in Section II were com- pleted after considering feed- back from the stakeholder engagement sessions held in October 2013. Prior to holding another stakeholder engage- ment session, the document was provided to NRC and FE- MA staff for comment in April 2014. During May 2014, the lead NRC-FEMA writing team made further changes to Sec- tions I and II based on staff input.
Download PDF
Development of draft Revision 2 of NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 continued during the 1st quar- ter of calendar year 2014 in preparation for the formal public comment period, which is scheduled to start in Octo- ber 2014. A preliminary draft of Section I was developed and changes to the evaluation criteria in Section II were com- pleted after considering feed- back from the stakeholder engagement sessions held in October 2013. Prior to holding another stakeholder engage- ment session, the document was provided to NRC and FE- MA staff for comment in April 2014. During May 2014, the lead NRC-FEMA writing team made further changes to Sec- tions I and II based on staff input.
Download PDF
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)